In terms of sequential write speed, the WD Blue 3D was beating the MX500 by small numbers. The reason could be the DRAM or the TLC NAND. I tried running these synthetic tests multiple times and both of these SSDs were performing great. Here, I can say that both of them are competing well. For this test, I used the CrystalDiskMark 8 software. For your information, this system has an Intel Core i5 8th Gen processor along with a 3200MHz DDR4 8GB RAM. So, keep reading.ĭetailed information about WD Blue (3D) Synthetic Benchmarks (Comparison) The actual results are going to be revealed further. But, the WD Blue is looking better if we look at the sequential write speed. With this table, we can say that the Crucial MX500 is good in terms of random write speed and TBW as well. But, I would like to compare them directly to give you a brief overview of both.
Theoretical Specifications (Comparison)īoth of these SSDs look almost similar in terms of the features shown on their official websites. Now, without any further delays, let’s get started. We always consider knowing every deeper detail about the SSDs and then give you the right suggestion. But, the SSD reaching the highest speeds limits is always considered as the best one. However, the performance results are going to be almost similar to other variants as well.īecause these both are SATA-3 SSDs, you can’t expect more than 600MB/s data read or write speed. But, I am going only the 1TB variants of both. I am doing direct comparisons to help you understand what you get with which SSDs. We will compare the offerings of all of these and then come to a conclusion.
Reviewed in the United Kingdom on 7 October 2020 I can safely say that I'm very pleased with this product. My original Crystal Disk Mark benchmark was taken using a USB caddy - when connected via SATA to the motherboard the speed increased and is similar to the other user benchmarks. I'm very impressed with the drive and would recommend to anyone looking for a Game Drive or for files that are backed up.Ĭurrently using 421/931GB to hold some Steam and Origin games.ĭrive continues to work great. I've included screenshots of the Crystal Disk Mark benchmark numbers I got from both a 1GB and 2GB file size runs (Empty Drive). There's 931GB usable space once formatted (NTFS). I plugged it in and initialised the disk. The drive itself is incredibly light and I was sceptical if there's much inside it to be fair. The packaging is very smart and you know you're in for a winner when there's flames all over the box (see pics). Gladly I've not yet had to put in for a refund and so far I've been very surprised by the performance of this unfamiliar branded SSD.
Ct500mx500ssd1 crystal disk mark plus#
I thought to myself that even if it is garbage I can return it without hassle thanks to Amazon's great customer service, plus I'm only using it for storing games on. I bought the ASENNO 1TB SSD after seeing it on offer for £58. Llevo probados fácil más de 100 discos ssd, tanto para casa como para la oficina.Ĭomo con todas las marcas, siempre salen un X% de defectuosos, pero de todas formas a mi me han fallado SSD de todas las marcas, no es posible fiarse de ninguna, siempre hay que tener backups.Īclarar que no estoy pagado por la marca, ni me los han regalado ). Personalmente siempre me he fiado sobre todo de samsung, pero también de crucial, kingston.
No está a la altura de los gama alta en cuanto a velocidad, pero por el precio merece mucho la pena. Adjunto test de velocidad comparando con un crucial BX500 que es otro de los económicos. Uno usado en un portátil y ningún problema, es del tamaño normal de los SSD.ĭe esta marca he comprado en 120Gb y en 240Gb, la verdad es que van muy bien. Quería probarlos en casa ya que los he visto en algunos ordenadores reacondicionados que compramos para clientes y de momento después de unos cuantos meses no han fallado ninguno (Si me falla lo pondré aquí).
0 kommentar(er)
